EnvyLighthouse · Cross-Subject Insight

Lake-Lehman School District

What the Math file and the ELA file say together — that neither says alone.
← Lake-Lehman district hub
The finding that reframes the whole conversation
95 students are scored as a math problem —
but the data says they have a writing problem.
That's about 1 in 10 of every math test taker. No single-subject report can see this, because it only exists when you read the Math and ELA files for the same student at once.
The Expression Gap

They can do the math. They can't put the reasoning into words.

These 95 students answer multiple-choice math correctly, then collapse on the open-response items that ask them to explain — and every one of them is also flagged Low on the ELA Text-Dependent-Analysis essay. The math score is a symptom. The cause is written expression.

57.5%Multiple-choice math
(they know it)
24.8%Open-response math
(they can't explain)
33 pts
the gap between knowing and explaining, for this cohort
45
of them are scored Below / Basic in math — a misdiagnosis
100%
are also Low on the ELA written-analysis essay
WHERE THEY ARE:28 · Lake-Lehman Jr/Sr High School26 · Lake-Noxen Elementary25 · Lehman-Jackson Elementary16 · Ross Elementary
Grade 4: 21Grade 5: 22Grade 6: 24Grade 7: 11Grade 8: 17
How we know: for each student we compare multiple-choice vs. open-response raw performance within the math test, then join to that same student's ELA reporting categories. A large MC–OE gap that co-occurs with a Low Text-Dependent-Analysis flag is the signature of an expression gap, not a content gap. What to do: writing-across-the-content-areas support and constructed-response practice — not more math remediation. Spending intervention dollars on these students as "math kids" is spending them in the wrong subject.
One Standard Away

16 students are a single standard from Proficient. Here's the roster.

Of 470 students sitting at Basic in math, 16 are held back by exactly one weak standard. That isn't a vague "needs support" list — it's a specific set of small groups a principal can schedule Monday.

The one standard they needStudentsSmall groupsWhere (top buildings)
D-MMeasurement & Data
Measurement and representing/interpreting data.
31 groupLehman-Jackson Elementary (2), Lake-Noxen Elementary (1)
C-GGeometry
Shapes, angles, area, surface area, volume, and the coordinate plane.
21 groupLehman-Jackson Elementary (1), Ross Elementary (1)
B-OOperations & Algebraic Thinking
Operations, patterns, and solving problems algebraically.
21 groupLehman-Jackson Elementary (2)
A-FNumbers & Operations—Fractions
Understand, compare, and compute with fractions.
21 groupLake-Noxen Elementary (1), Ross Elementary (1)
A-NThe Number System
Integers, rational numbers, and their operations.
21 groupLake-Lehman Jr/Sr High School (2)
A-TNumbers & Operations in Base Ten
Place value, multi-digit arithmetic, and decimals.
11 groupLehman-Jackson Elementary (1)
A-RRatios & Proportional Relationships
Ratios, rates, proportions, and percent problems.
11 groupLehman-Jackson Elementary (1)
D-SStatistics & Probability
Summarizing data, distributions, and probability.
11 groupLake-Lehman Jr/Sr High School (1)
B-EExpressions & Equations
Write, evaluate, and solve expressions, equations, and inequalities.
11 groupLake-Lehman Jr/Sr High School (1)
B-FFunctions
Define, evaluate, compare, and use functions.
11 groupLake-Lehman Jr/Sr High School (1)
43.2% → 44.8%
District math proficiency if these 16 single-standard students cross the line — reachable with 10 targeted small groups, not a district-wide program.
How we know: we take every student scored Basic in math, count their Low reporting-category flags, and isolate those with exactly one. Each maps to a single eligible-content standard and a home building — so the intervention is a named group, sized, and located. Why it matters: the cheapest proficiency points in any district are the students already almost there. This finds them by name and tells you the one thing each needs.
DEMONSTRATION. Scores shown are synthetic / illustrative, generated for product demonstration — not actual student results. Displayed on Lake-Lehman's real building names for realism.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by Lake-Lehman. · EnvyLighthouse · a product of Envy Group, Inc. · Standards: PA Core Assessment Anchors & Eligible Content (public). Confidential.